User talk:jpgordon
Index
|
|||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 |
|---|
| 7 February 2025 |
|
For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Unblock humor here. UtherSRG (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Technical news
- Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
- A '
Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.
13 February, 2025
[edit]Hey there, I'm 81567518W.
I see you undid my recent contribution to Antisemitism with the comment "WP:BLP forbids this." Can you please let me know what policy is pertinent here? Thanks! 81567518W (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please open this discussion at Talk:Antisemitism. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
You did it again
[edit]Priceless.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hello Jpgordon, I’m not sure if I should be using this space for this, but I wanted to bring something to your attention. One of the users you unblocked, User:Koshuri Sultan (Based Kashmiri), mentioned that they wouldn’t disappoint you for unblocking them [2]. However, MrAnonymous699 was a sockmaster involved in meatpuppetry as well. The sockpuppets and meatpuppets had several issues with many users, including myself, for not allowing them to carry out their desired actions. The Indian WP:MILHIST topic area is quite complex, filled with users who celebrates thier pride in an ugly way, and MrAnonymous699 was one of them. In fact, their actions helped those who reported them catch them in the act. Unblocking them was a bad option, or at least it should have prevented them from editing South Asian articles. Now, they seem to be retaliating by editing the articles I work on, reverting changes, which could lead to potential edit warring, and even attempting to delete the articles I created. I was the one proposed deleting the articles they created—perhaps out of a sense of vengeance? The user’s battleground behaviour, and I noticed Noorullah21’s comment above as well. MrAnonymous699 had socks because his editings weren't healthy(you know what I meant). They view other fellow editors as their enemies. Just wanted to bring the situation to your attention. The user will definitely be here as they pokes my contributions frequently. Good day. Imperial[AFCND] 17:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- You should stop making these frivolous complaints, an editor that has appealed their sanction is an editor in good standing. Casting unsubstantiated aspersions and poisoning the well in a contentious topic is not a good idea. Koshuri (グ) 17:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Anonymous 699 is where to raise a new investigation. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)