Talk:Constantinople

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constantinople article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Constantinople was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 2, 2006	Good article reassessment	Delisted
November 10, 2019	Peer review	Not reviewed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 11, 2004, May 11, 2005, May 11, 2006, May 11, 2011, and May 11, 2014.
This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of September 17, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article

Greece: Byzantine Top‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Former countries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries

Middle Ages: Crusades High‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Classical Greece and Rome Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Top‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Constantinople (37 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	10,081	10,081
Names	150	9,804
Before Constantinople	3,475	3,475
Names of Constantinople	3,617	3,617
Modern names of the city	2,562	2,562
History	490	58,226
Foundation of Byzantium	4,698	4,698
324–337: The refoundation as Constantinople	6,578	6,578
337–529: Constantinople during the Barbarian Invasions and the fall of the West	3,269	3,269
527–565: Constantinople in the Age of Justinian	8,149	8,149
Survival, 565–717: Constantinople during the Byzantine Dark Ages	2,428	2,428
717–1025: Constantinople during the Macedonian Renaissance	4,907	6,548
Iconoclast controversy in Constantinople	1,641	1,641
1025–1081: Constantinople after Basil II	1,069	1,069
1081–1185: Constantinople under the Komneni	4,391	4,391
1185–1261: Constantinople during the Imperial Exile	9,023	9,023
1261–1453: Palaiologan Era and the Fall of Constantinople	7,890	7,890
1453–1930: Ottoman and Republican Kostantiniyye	3,693	3,693
Culture	3,406	43,235
Women in literature	1,311	1,311
Markets	737	737
Architecture and coinage	1,776	1,776
Religion	687	687
Education	33,732	33,732
Media	107	1,586
Film	333	333
Newspaper	1,146	1,146
International status	2,379	2,379
See also	16	3,687
People from Constantinople	76	76
Secular buildings and monuments	397	397
Churches, monasteries and mosques	2,886	2,886
Miscellaneous	312	312
Notes	26	26
References	30	30
Bibliography	7,107	7,107
External links	2,679	2,679
Total	137,254	137,254

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Parts of Michael Gove's levelling-up plan 'copied from Wikipedia'". The Independent. 3 February 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2022. One off-beat part of the report reads: "Constantinople was the capital of the Roman/Byzantine Empire (330-1204 and 1261-1453), the Latin Empire (1204-1261) and the Ottoman Empire (1453-1922)". The text is identical to the first line of the Wikipedia page for Constantinople, right down to formatting and punctuation.

On 18 March 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to History of Istanbul (324–1453 AD). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Separate article for Istanbul and Constantinople

So I have noticed a lot of old byzantine cities that got renamed have separate articles, Istanbul and Constantinople in this case and one for Edessa and Urfa.

Why is this ? if the city was renamed/conquered in other places it doesn't get a new article. The article on Gdańsk for example is the modern name of the city. Any articles referencing danzig are about specific political entities, like "the free city of Danzig" article. Why is this different ? Shouldn't continuously inhabited cities have single articles regardless of name changes ? Jaynorg (talk) 10:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the article and the sources, there is no overarching standard. Here are other examples where earlier periods of a settlement have different articles:

Remsense诉 11:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is definitely consensus against closing. (non-admin closure) History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– Additional suggestions which are not moves: splitting History of Constantinople into multiple articles to be sub-articles of the main History of Istanbul (324–1453 AD) article, and merge Tsargrad into Names of Istanbul.

The reason is that most casual readers will not be immediately aware that Istanbul had several names historically, so using five of those names (Istanbul, Constantinople, Byzantium, New Rome, and Tsargrad) as titles for different articles isn't really in line with WP:AT policy about using easily-recognizable and consistent article names. Also, the names "Constantinople" and "Istanbul" were both used at the same time for many centuries, which means that the division of historical periods based on city name in use at the time, rather than on explicitly stating the historical period in the article title, is quite unclear (as can be seen by the level of overlap in content between several of these articles). The historical name could be introduced in the lede rather than being used as the title, with something like Between 324 and 1453 AD, the present-day city of Istanbul was generally known as "Constantinople". Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 15:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed there's a sixth name for the city as a separate article title! Merge Semystra into History of Istanbul (pre-324 AD) too... Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 15:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as proposed. Support History of Istanbul → History of Istanbul (1453–present). Leave the others as they are. Also move History of Constantinople to History of Constantinople (330–1453). The names Istanbul and Constantinople were used interchangeably from the Ottoman conquest until 1930, even in Turkish sources. But before 1453 it was commonly only Constantinople or Byzantium. These moves would add clarity. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Necrothesp I struggle to see why do we have Constantinople and History of Constantinople? This article is pretty much about the history of the city that stood where Istanbul today stands 324–1453 AD. Those should be merged into one.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 21:35, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's another issue. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Part Oppose as proposed, per Necrothesp. Plus New Rome should probably not have its own article, and didn't the Russians later self-describe that way? Merge that to one of the other articles, & set up a disam page. "Istanbul" should not be used for articles covering pre-1453, even though that name was not invented them. Johnbod (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's worth noting that standard practice is for "history of X" articles on Wikipedia to cover the entire history of a place, including before it received its current name. See History of Wrocław, History of Eswatini, History of New York City, History of Bratislava, History of Beijing, History of Prayagraj, History of Tbilisi, Timeline of Almaty, Timeline of Volgograd, etc. Using previous names of cities as article titles is uncommon. Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 19:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the city is so famous as Constantinople that that would be seen as utterly anachronistic. It was the greatest city in the world. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The city has had many names under its considerably long history. "Byzantium", "Constantinople" and "Istanbul" are all equally valid historical names, although only "Istanbul" is in use nowadays. JIP | Talk 22:20, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose does not help users -- imposes terms not in common use among reliable sources. Rjensen (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose moving Constantinople and Byzantium as proposed. There is precedent of the current approach. See Antioch, Königsberg, Edo, Londinium, Tenochtitlan, Aelia Capitolina, Eboracum, Thebes and Chang'an. —Srnec (talk) 02:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as historical revisionism. "Istanbul" was virtually unknown and unused in the west until the twentieth century, and is still all but unknown in mainstream historical scholarship. I could get behind using "Constantinople" for the entire period from Constantine to recent times, but the common name remained "Constantinople" until the twentieth century. Also oppose the dating format "337 AD", etc.; it should be "AD 337". P Aculeius (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm obviously the minority here. But mainly supporting because the proposed naming scheme is more WP:CONSISTENT and less likely to confuse readers. VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 04:47, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move. Istanbul was Constantinople, so this page should stay at Constantinople. O.N.R. ^(talk) 20:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed. It just doesn't sit right with me to change the names of these articles to refer to it's current one. The names of these articles are more popular then simply calling it the "history of Istanbul," so that's why I oppose. Quincy2293 (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.